Plain
Talk
Compliments
of Lex
Edited
by Qui Tam
Proof-Read
by Dianne Morrison
In my so humble biased
personal opinion, all these people out there being made offers by the bankrupt
brokass US Corporation via hypothecations and all their sub corporations [eo
nominee] and that are trying to discharge debt and "Charges" brought
by these "Piratas" (18 USC 1651-1661) through (bills of exchange,
bond for discharge, pre authorized transfers, closed account checks, drafts and
the like) who do not really understand what is going on and are in fact de
facto in fashion in regard to their opinion and thinking pattern of
being outside the "debt/credit matrix". Such reasoning defies even the generally
accepted accounting procedures of the Oxfordian Elitists.
When you get a Bill,
Charge or offer, there MUST be a "Check" enclosed. And if there is not, the offerer is in
"Breach" of good faith in the course of dealing and usage of trade
[deceptive trade practices] and the offer was fraud from the Git!, and the
offerer needs to be Prosecuted and His/Her assets liquidated to settle the
account, and NOT offered to be paid again or offered some other kind of
discharge or tender!!!!! When you offer
some sort of settlement as mentioned above, first of all YOU are admitting that
YOU OWE them something, BIG MISTAKE in my so humble biased opinion! They need to be exorcised in their
"PERSONAL COMMERCIAL LIABILITY" FOR EXTORTION AND FRAUD PERIOD!!!!
(ACCEPTED FOR VALUE, I DID NOT FIND YOUR CHECK HEREWITH!!!) That means they
have not fulfilled their fiduciary and moral duty as holders of the account by
BALANCING the account upon receiving your "full Acceptance"
(Authorization) as the authorized representative in "FACT," of the
ALL UPPER CASE ENTITY they are proceeding against. The Offerror has the primary liability to pay
the charge or claim and settle the account.
You [the real man/woman] were the one who CREATED the credit [MY WORD IS
MY BOND] and THEY are just holders of the account and are required to write
their corporate check to balance the account upon your authorization. As trustees and stewards of all that is and
shall ever be over creation you have every ‘Right of Property’ to claim and exercise your exemption and
establish your credit for and on behalf of Yahweh and Yahushua as the
Principals and absolute owners of and over your entire Estate in law. When the revenuers fail to do that they NOW
need to be served Due Process Notices such as a Declaration "Affidavit of
Commercial Truth", Bill of Particulars, Discovery Disclosure (Subpoena
Duces Tecum, See Below), a Show Cause why tort of fraud and deceit [dolus
malice] should not issue, and a surety bond with criminal charges
assessed" served up to them by Notarial process, bringing the
actor/offender into Commercial Dishonor and extra-judicially forcing
LIQUIDATION OF THEIR ASSETS!!!!!
This is both a
substantive and a procedural process that needs to be internalized and
understood all the way through, otherwise contrary presumptions may arise
resulting in your obligations to pay or perform according to their
demands. I am going to write it down
here, -- something I don't usually do is write down
processes.
Remember, if you are not
Prosecuting you are defending, if you are defending you WILL LOSE! You MUST EXHAUST your administrative
remedies. Hence, all cases are won or
lost before they ever get to court. There
are a lot of people out there that are selling processes and I believe if they
were that successful and they knew what they were talking about, they would not
need to ask to be paid, that is the first sign you can tell when it is a scam
and not a real tool. First here is a
list of the docs that are required to use this process. Also a good source of info for learning about
the Notary is the Notary Public hand book by Alfred E. Piombino, National
edition, you can order it by calling 800-405-1070. Also research "Notary authentication
[Apostille]" on the internet for your state. This is incomplete as I have not included any
of the documents required for completing this process, if you cannot do them on
your own, then you are not ready to embark on this process YET!!.also, Something that needs to be said here is that these
“Bonds for Discharge” people are using is “Issuing Credit” and when you give
them a “bond for discharge” all you are doing is FUNDING TERRORISM!!! When you get an “Offer” and “Accept it for
Value” and they do not accept it to discharge the “Charge” that means THEIR
Offer was FRAUD to begin with. If they
come forward with a fraudulent claim and you issue them credit all you have
done is proliferate the extortion and “Terrorism”. They can monetize it,
fractionalize it and use it for their benefit when in FACT they had NO claim to
begin with; this is just another one trick pony in the moronathon [Shetar
Trek]!!!! A BOND FOR DISCHARGE is just
like a CREDIT CARD you are ISSUING to THEM!!
The people promoting this crap have no idea what a disaster they are
setting people up for!!! O. K. so let’s look at it. If you want to use the Bond for Discharge it can be incorporated, write it up, send
them a certified true and correct “COPY” of it by the Notary telling them the
Notary is holding it and they can have it “IF” and “WHEN” they provide the
proper verification/validation via remittance of a “Certified/Valid” copy of
their assessment signed under penalty of perjury, the Notary will release it to
them, but they won’t, they can’t and never will, so now they have assessed
[tacitly admitted] themselves (agreed, an assessment is an agreement) to having
come to equity with UNCLEAN HANDS, IN BAD FAITH IN THE COURSE OF DEALING AND
USAGE OF TRADE [Deceptive Trade Practices] and now they cannot hold any
equity in either the account or the credit/assets used to fund the account, and
have commercially forfeited it all to YOU, so why pay them or issue them
credit for their TERRORIST EXTORTIONATE ACTIVITY? Also something people do not understand about
the Notary, he is an Officer of the Court, and when you send a notice
out to one of these extortionate pirate [nul tiel] corporations asking for
verification and a valid assessment for the Charges they have brought, and they
do not comply, the Notary IS NOW BOUND as an officer of the Court to report
that a FELONY[S] has been committed AGAINST YOU [the real man/woman] by the
Extortionate TERRORIST little Pirate BASTARDS [see: Hebrews, Chapter 12:8] ‘18
USC' 4 MISPRISION OF FELONY and now CRIMINAL SANCTIONS are necessary and
proper!!!!!
Saviour said: “Forgive them NOT! for they know what they do.” The Books of Enoch/Jasher. For anyone to admit they did not know what
they were doing makes them incompetent and a public delict [in delictual
fault]. DO NOT prevaricate
these truths with these criminals, THEY KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING, THEY
ARE NOT YOUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS AND THERE IS NO FORGIVENESS WITHOUT
Confession of Judgment and REPENTENCE!!!!....LUKE 11: 46-53. They are stealing your ‘Right of Property,’
and using it against you to deprive you of residence and citizenship in the
Kingdom of Elohim on this Earth; the one and only Guaranteed Republican Form of
Government, i.e., self-governing!!!!! YOUR ESTATE IN LAW.
Also a Notary as an OFFICER OF THE COURT cannot demand payment in
SPECIES {31 USC ' 5118} for his fees and MUST accept your private [closed
account] checks, and the BANK MUST process them, and if the Bank tries to pull
crap, the Notary has the Tribunal that appointed him (Director of the Dept
of Licensing, the Governor, and Secretary of State [I.A.C.A.]) standing
behind him and to Step up for him to get the check processed or bring
criminal charges forward against the ‘Delinquent fiduciary’!!!!!!! Now once
your notary has successfully processed your ‘Private check’ no one, no bank, no
business can say, your checks are no good anymore!!!!!!!!!!!!...............so
here is how to start..
1.The original offers that you have been
given i.e. ticket, summons, credit card bill, etc. "Accepted for
value" and signed, using your EIN, and
notarized.
2. Your Declaration, "Commercial Affidavit of Truth."
3. Your "Discovery Disclosure Request"
(Subpoena Duces Tecum, read at the bottom). Clerks of Courts provide these forms for
free.
4. Your "Show Cause" why Tort should
NOT issue.
5. A "COPY" of the Surety Bond written up with ALL the
assessed damages, the amount of the ORIGINAL charge, including an
amount of interest thereon, with civil and criminal assessed damages added.
18 USC Sec. 3571.
6. Request for Notarial service (Notary Protest).
7. Notice of Notary Service.
8. Notice of Breach.
9. Certificate of Default and/or Dishonor.
Now your process begins:
1. Now when you get your
first set of docs done and ready to go, get them notarized, get them
filed or registered in the County and get a "Certified copy" of each
of them, for they tend to get lost. The
original offer you accept for value
and HAVE IT NOTARIZED AND IT goes back to the OFFERER, i.e. cop,
prosecutor, attorney, Credit card company CEO, collection agency, Bank., IRS
crony, etc.
2. Put the Notice of
Notary Service with your Declaration, "Affidavit of Commercial
Truth", and your Discovery Disclosure (Subpoena Deuces Tecum), Show Cause,
and (((COPY)))
of the Surety Bond giving them seventy two (72) hours in which to respond.
72 hours is appropriate under authority of The Expeditious Transaction Act [12
C.F.R., Part 226.1] and the Truth in Lending Act [31 C.F.R., Section
226.1]. They Know this 72 hours from the
time they sign the return receipt to get something IN THE MAIL on its way back
to you!! They have an additional 3 days
after their 72 hours is up for mail travel time. They also know if they need more time to ASK
for it, they do NOT need to be told!!!
3. Send them out by
"Certified Mail" return receipt.
4. If in 6 days from the
mailing receipt date you have no response, send out the Notary "Notice of Breach"
(non-Response). If you do get a
response, in some cases you may, and it is incorrect, have the Notary state in
the "notice of breach", "Thank
you for your recent correspondence, although it was incorrect" and give
them three (3) more days (72 hrs.) in which to respond CORRECTLY rebutting your
Affidavit POINT FOR POINT, FULL DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE (DEMANDING VERIFICATION
AND PRODUCTION OF A VALID ASSESSMENT), AND SHOW CAUSE WHY TORT SHOULD NOT ISSUE. (Note) The Notary is an officer of the court,
(and also has more power than a supreme court Judge) so if you have been
made an offer and there is NO Verification nor VALID assessment for their Offer
THEY
have committed a FELONY and as an officer of the court the Notary MUST see VALID
VERIFICATION of the assessment for the offer or he IS required to report it to
the US Marshals, Attorney General, and John Snow at the US Treasury (18 USC
Sec.4 Misprision of felony).
5. In three (3) days (72hrs.) when
you do not receive a "Correct" response, the Notary issues you a
"Certificate of Default" and Surety bond in the sum certain of
whatever damages have been assessed as evidenced by your Declaration,
"Affidavit of Commercial Truth" and stated in your "Show Cause."
6. Now you have copies
of EVERYTHING, including your certificate of mailings and return receipts that
went to all parties who were involved or notified put into one nice neat file
in Chronological order, and you ADD your "Amended Complaint"
(Criminal Complaint) and Form 95 Tort Claim.
7. Now you take it back
down to the County recorders office (Authentication Dept) and they have the
record of the Notary's appointment on file and get your process Documentation
(Authenticated). This could be
different in different states, could be the county court clerk, the UCC office,
it varies from place to place. Research
it by looking up “Notary Authentication” for your state on the internet. Once
your Documents are filed and Recorded under Notary Seal, they become self-authenticating
under Evidence Rule 902 and are no longer subject to argument or re-negotiation.
8. Now you take your process documentation up to
the Secretary of State’s office and get it "Apostilled" which
verifies the authentication that the County did.
9. After you get your
Apostille you send it off to the
10. Now that you have
"Full Legal Recognition" of your documents, file it on a UCC-3 or a
UCC-1 at the Dept. of Licensing and follow-up with a UCC-11 search and get a
"Certified Copy." Now you have
an “Accounts Receivable,” listed as the Debtor’s assets which in turn can be
extra-judicially liquidated to satisfy the Charge or Claim the original
Offerer, for and on behalf of his/her principal, Defaulted on and Dishonored from
the GIT!!!!!.
Indeed, the chiefest part of everything is the beginning.
11. Now you take it BACK to
the county and get it registered and get a "Certified copy" back from
them, and "IF" there just so happens to be a Court Case open on the
dispute that this derived from, take a "Certified copy" and file into
the Case and get a "Certified Copy" from the Clerk. Always cover your ass as documents do get
lost.
12. Now you are ready to "Collect." You must have your notary write up a few
letters to accompany your document stating that he/she has in his/her file
Surety Bonds in the name of these parties who have dishonored for the sum
certain amount of $$$$. These next
steps may or may not have any effect (since you are and have been dealing with
criminals/outlaws) but it is an option.
I personally choose otherwise. (Sell the Bonds to an interested broker
on the open market, foreign or otherwise, at a discount, and let them proceed
to collect as they were an innocent purchaser for value taking free of any
defect that may have been overlooked in the foregoing process.). Also the Notary can go to Risk Management
and freeze the Bonds of any Public Delinquents that you now have an
authenticated Certificate of Default and Bond against. There is also what is called a Marshals 285
Form **fn/4** that may be used for
collection purposes, (Extra-Judicial Writ of Execution
must be accompanied with the Form 285, annexed hereto). The Marshals may also be used to serve any
documents being sent from the Notary “Officer of the Court” to anyone at any
stage in the process. Just pay their service
fee and forget it.
13. The first letter from
the Notary will go to the Sec of Treasury requesting a check to be sent for sum
certain to release these bonds (the originals) to him/her, the Notary is
holding.
14. The second letter from
the Notary will go to the Sec of the Department of Transportation requesting he
provide a Certificate of Release to the Secretary of Treasury, John Snow to
release the funds to release the Bonds from the Notary.
15. The third letter will go
to the Director of the IRS to report the "Delinquents" who have
dishonored you that they are TAX FUGITIVES in possession of delinquent and
unreported income tax. There are a
number of ways to collect on the bonds. You could put an amended complaint with
your documentary of the events file in the case file and do a removal to
I do not claim to have
all the answers or to know it all, I just know what I know and know what has
worked for me. I am just relaying what I
have learned from standing upon the shoulders of Giants! If you have the eyes to see and the ears to
here, there are some among us, and they drop many Diamonds along their paths,
it is up to you to find them and make something from them!!!! This is a very basic process and written in
the best way I know how to explain it. It is for learning material and I do not
mean it to be legal advice in any way, shape or form and is left at the user’s
discretion to what ends it will be implemented...i.e. In My so humble biased
personal opinion.
Very
Sincerely,
Lex
The association
applies for and is authorized to function as a "Federal Tax & Loan
Depositary" (31 CFR Part 202, et seq.), then it takes a next step to
function as a mixed-ownership government corporation (31 U.S.C. ' 9101), which
may be a federal home loan bank, farm credit bank, intermediate credit bank or
whatever. In this capacity the
institution may initiate loans and service loans on behalf of the principal of
interest -- Government of the
ASSESSMENT & LIABILITY
ASSENT, contracts. An agreement to something that has
been done before. 2. It is either
express, where it is openly declared; or implied, where it is presumed by
law. For instance, when a conveyance is
made to a man, his assent to it is presumed, for the following reasons; because
there is a strong intendment of law, that it is for a person's benefit **fn/2**
to take, and no man can be supposed to be unwilling to do that which is for his
advantage. 2. Because it would seem
incongruous and absurd, that when a conveyance is completely executed on the
part of the grantor, the estate should continue in him. 3. Because it is contrary to the policy of
law to permit the freehold to remain in suspense and uncertainty. 2 Ventr. 201; 3 Mod. 296A 3 Lev. 284; Show. P. C. 150; 3 Barn. &
Alders. 31; 1 Binn. R. 502; 2 Hayw. 234; 12 Mass IR. 461 4 Day, 395; 5 S.
& R. 523 20 John. R. 184; 14 S. & R. 296 15 Wend. R. 656; 4
Halst. R. 161; 6 Verm. R. 411.3.
When a devise draws after it no charge or risk of loss, and is, therefore,
a mere bounty, the assent of the devisee to take it will be presumed. 17
TO ASSESS. 1. To
rate or to fix the proportion which every person has to pay of any particular
tax. 2. To assess damages is to ascertain
what damages are due to the plaintiff; in actions founded on writings, in many
cases after interlocutory judgment, the prothonotary is directed to assess the
damages; in cases sounding in tort the damages are frequently assessed on a
writ of inquiry by the sheriff and a jury.
3. In actions for damages, the jury is required to fix the amount or to
assess the damages. In the exercise of
this power or duty, the jury must be guided by sound discretion, and, when the
circumstances will warrant it, may give high damages. Const.
Rep. 500. The jury must, in the
assessment of damages, be guided by their own judgment, and not by a blind
chance. They cannot lawfully, therefore,
in making up their verdict, each one put down a sum, add the sums together,
divide the aggregate by the number of jurors, and adopt the quotient for their
verdict. 1 Cowen, 238.ASSESSMENT. The making out a list of property, and fixing
its valuation or appraisement; it is also applied to making out a list of
persons, and appraising their several occupations, chiefly with a view of
taxing the said persons and their property.
ASSESSMENT
OF DAMAGES. After an interlocutory judgment has been obtained, the
damages must be ascertained; the act of thus fixing the amount of damages is
called the assessment of damages. 2. In
cases sounding in damages, (q. v.) that is, when the object of the action is to
recover damages only, and not brought for the specific recovery of lands,
goods, or sums of money, the usual course is to issue a writ of inquiry, (q.
v.) and, by virtue of such writ, the sheriff, aided by twelve lawful men,
ascertains the amount of damages, and makes return to the court of the
inquisition, which, unless set aside, fixes the damages, and a final judgment
follows. 3. When, on the contrary, the
action is founded on a promissory note, bond, or other contract in writing, by
which the amount of money due may be easily computed, it is the practice, in
some courts, to refer to the clerk or prothonotary the assessment of damages,
and in such case no writ of inquiry is issued. 3 Bouv.
Inst. n. 8300.
Assessor. An officer chosen or
appointed to appraise, value, or assess property. Always public, and always de
facto. **fn/3**
The assessing power, and not merely the county
assessor. A person learned in a
particular science of industry, who sits with the
judge on the trial of a cause requiring such special knowledge and gives his
advice. In
Trinity House. In English Law. A society at Deptford Strond,
Incorporated by Henry the VIII in 1515, for the promotion of commerce and
navigation by licensing and regulating pilots, and ordering and erecting
beacons, light-houses, buoys, etc. Whorton.Trinity Masters. Elder Brethren of
the Trinity House. If a question
arising in an admiralty action depends upon technical skill and experience in
navigation, the judge or court is usually assisted at the hearing by two
Trinity Masters, who sit as assessors, and advise the court on questions of
nautical character. Williams
and B. Adm. Jur. 271: Sweet. Trinity Sittings. Sittings of the English
court of appeal and of the high court of justice in
REMEMBER ALL DEBT
BEGINS IN ADMIRALTY AND IS BARGAINED FOR OR CONTRACTED OUTSIDE THE
CONSTITUTION. WHY? BECAUSE THE Original Jurisdiction
Constitution of 1776-1787, adopted in 1878 as the Municipal Charter of the
D.O.C. requires gold or silver coin of a specific weight and fineness
[numismatic value] in order to pass res and title in any/all transactions and
establishes in law as opposed to “at law,” or under color of any law, in the
settlement of accounts. See: Article 3,
Constitution, Annotated Cases, at your local Law
Library.
ASSESSORS,
civil law. So called from the word adsidere, which
signifies to be seated with the judge.
They were lawyers who were appointed to assist, by their advice, the
Roman magistrates, who were generally ignorant of law being mere military men.
Dig. lib. 1, t. 22; Code, lib.
1, t. 51.2. In
our law an assessor is one who has been legally appointed to value and appraise
property, generally with a view of laying a tax on its ASSETS. The property in the hands of an heir,
executor, administrator or trustee, which is legally or equitably chargeable
with the obligations, which such heir, executor, administrator or other
trustee, is, as such, required to discharge, is called assets. The term is derived from the French word
assez, enough; that is, the heir or trustee has enough property. But the property is still called assets,
although there may not be enough to discharge all the obligations; and the
heir, executor, &c., is chargeable in distribution as far as such property
extends. 2. Assets are sometimes divided
by all the old writers, into assets entre
mains and assets per descent;
considered as to their mode of distribution, they are 1egal or equitable; as to
the property from which they arise, they are real or personal. 3. Assets
entre mains, or assets in hand, is such property as at once comes to the
executor or other trustee, for the purpose of satisfying claims against him as
such. Termes de la Ley. 4. Assets
per descent, is that portion of the ancestor's estate which descends to the
heir, and which is sufficient to charge him, as far as it goes, with the specialty debts of his ancestor. 2 Williams on Ex. 1011. 5. Legal assets, are
such as constitute the fund for the payment of debts according to their legal
priority. 6. Equitable assets, are such
as can be reached only by the aid of a court of equity, and are to be divided, pari passu, among all the creditors; as
when a debtor has made his property subject to his debts generally, which,
without his act would not have been so subject. 1 Madd.
ASSEVERATION. The proof which a man gives of the truth of
what be says, by appealing to his conscience as a witness. It differs from an oath in this, that by the
latter he appeals to God as a witness of the truth of what he says, and invokes
him as the avenger of falsehood and perfidy, to punish him if he speak not the
truth. Vide Affirmation; Oath; and Merl.
Quest. de Droit, mot Serment.
Liability is defined
thus: Liability, n, 1. The quality or state of being
legally obligated or accountable; legal responsibility to another or to
society, enforceable by civil remedy or criminal punishment <liability for
injuries caused by negligence>.-- also termed legal liability. 2. (Often pl.) A financial or pecuniary obligation; DEBT <tax liability>
<assets and liabilities>."
The term “liability” is one of at least double signification. In one sense it is the synonym of duty, the
correlative of right; in this sense it is the opposite of privilege or
liberty. If a duty rests upon a party,
society is now commanding performance by him and threatening penalties. In a second sense, the term “liability” is
the correlative of power and the opposite of immunity. In this case society is not yet commanding
performance, but it will so command if the possessor of the power does some
operative act. If one has a power the
other has a liability. It would be wise
to adopt the second sense exclusively. “Accurate
legal thinking is difficult when the
fundamental terms have shifting senses." William R.
Anson, Principals of Law and Contract 9 (Arthur L. Corbin ed., 3d Am. ed 1919). "Liability or responsibility is the bond
of necessity that exists between the wrongdoer and the remedy of the
wrong. This vinculum juris is not one of mere duty or obligation; it pertains
not to the sphere of ought but to that of must." John
Salmond, Jurisprudence 364 (Glanville L. Williams ed., 10th ed. 1947) Black's
law dictionary, seventh edition, page 925.
Liability is often used in conjunction with debt and obligation, as in
"debt, obligation or liability". Debt is defined: Debt. 1. Liability on a claim; a specific sum of money
due by agreement or otherwise <the debt amounted to $2500>. 2. The aggregate of all existing claims
against a person, entity or state <they denied the loan application after
analyzing the applicant's outstanding debt>.
3. A non-monetary thing that one person owes another, such as goods or
services <her debt was to supply him with 20 international first-class
tickets on the airline of his choice> 4. A common-law writ by which a court
adjudicates claims involving fixed sums of money <he brought suit in
debt>. - also termed (in sense 4) writ of
debt. "The action of debt lies where a party claims the recovery of a debt; that is, a
liquidated or certain sum of money due him.
The action in based upon contract, but the contract may be implied,
either in fact or in law, as well as express; it may be either a simple
contract or a specialty. The most common
instances of its use are for debts: (a) Upon
unilateral contracts express or implied in fact. (B) Upon quasi-contractual
obligations having the force and effect of simple contracts. (C) Upon bonds and
covenants under seal. (D) Upon judgments or obligations of record. (E) Upon obligations imposed by statute." Benjamin J. Shipman, Handbook of Common-Law Pleadings ' 52, at 132
(Henry Winthrop Ballantine ed., 3rd ed. 1923). Black's
law dictionary, seventh edition, page 410. Obligation is defined: Obligation, n. 1. A legal or moral duty to do or not to do something. 2. A
formal, binding agreement or acknowledgment of a liability to pay a certain
thing for a particular person or set of persons. - Also termed legal
obligation. See DUTY. LIABILITY." In English-speaking countries an unfortunate
habit has arisen of using `obligation' in a lax manner as co-extensive with
duties of every kind." Fredrick Pollock, A First Book of Jurisprudence
82 (1896)" A
man cannot be obliged or bound to the entire community: His duties to the
political society of which he is a member are matters of public, or criminal
law. Nor can the whole community be
under obligation to him: the rights on
his part correlative to the duties owed to him would be rights in rem, would be
in the nature of property as opposed to obligation. The word obligation has been unfortunately
used in this sense by Austin and Bentham as including the general duty, which
the law imposes on all, to respect such rights as the law sanctions. Whether the rights are to personal freedom or
security, to character, or to those more material objects which we commonly
call property, they impose corresponding duties on all to forbear from
molesting the right. Such rights are
rights in rem. But it is of the essence
of obligation that the duties which it imposes are imposed on definite persons,
and are themselves definite: the rights which it creates are rights in
personam." William R. Anson, Principles of the Law of Contracts 9 (Arthur
L. Corbin ed., 3d Am. ed. 1919)" Obligation in its popular sense is
merely a synonym for duty. Its legal
sense, derived from Roman law, differs from this in several respects. In the first place, obligations are merely
one class of duties, namely, those which are the correlatives of rights in
personam. An obligation is the vinculum juris, or bond of legal necessity, which binds together two or more
determinate individuals. Secondly, the
term obligatio is in law the name,
not merely the duty, but also the correlative right. It denotes a legal relationship or vinculum juris in its entirety,
including the right of the one party, no less than the liability of the
other. Looked at from the point of view
of the person entitled, an obligation is a right; looked at from the point of
view of the bound, it is a duty An
obligation, therefore, may be defined as a property right in personam or a duty
which corresponds to such a right." John Salmond,
Jurisprudence 460 (Glanville R. Williams ed., 10th ed. 1947).
These definitions are not put here
to add tedium to the reading, although they may very well do just that. They are put here to show a connection of
liability, debt and obligation. They are
all a bond between definite parties.
Just as there are two sides to every story, there are two sides to
liability, obligation and debt. If a
debt exists then there is a debtor and a creditor. Obligations have an obligee and an
obligor. They have correlatives of
rights and duties. Liability is the
same. Anyone with a liability has a duty
to perform on that liability. Whoever
holds that liability has the right to that performance. Anytime two parties are brought into a
commercial relationship, a bond (contact) is formed that establishes obligation
or liability. But it takes two parties.
When you receive a demand for the payment of money or specific performance of
any kind, the first thing you have to do is to determine if you have a liability
to the person making the demand. What is
your obligation and what is their right to receive payment or performance from
you? Did they perform labor; render a
service; supply material? Different
people have come up with different ways to ask for the liability.
Richard Cornforth says, "It is not now nor
has it ever been my intention to avoid paying any obligation that I may
lawfully owe. In order that I can
arrange to pay the obligation I may owe, please document and verify the
obligation." I like Mr.
Cornforth's writing. In all that I have
seen, it is direct, succinct and says everything that needs to be said, and
nothing else. He understands the need
for affidavits in everything we do. He
uses them often and well. What he is
doing with his “please document and verify the obligation," is asking to
be shown his liability. Others may say "I accept your document
for value and will pay upon proof of claim" or something of this
nature. This is just another way of
asking, "What is my liability?"
If you are liable to someone then you have a duty to them and they have
a correlative right to receive payment or performance. When a demand is made
upon you for payment or performance and there is no liability on your part,
that is a fraud and an injury and a tort claim is in order.
How this fits into commercial
operation of the government is very simple. Governments, Federal, State and
County, make claims upon Citizens. These
claims are almost invariably commercial in nature. For a claim to be valid, it must be based on
a liability. If you pay a claim where
there is no liability evidenced, then you can't be sure you are actually paying
anything. You may be just donating to
someone's pocket or bank account. This
is why Mr. Cornforth says "...Please document and verify the
obligation." In other words show me the document that I signed that
creates my liability or else swear upon oath that I owe you anything. If that verified documentation is not
forthcoming then you are about to get defrauded.
The Uniform Commercial
Code (UCC) in article 3, ' 505 lists the rights of a party presented with a
demand for payment. The first is the right to see the instrument that created the debt. (The document showing your liability) Second,
you have the right to reasonable identification of the party making the
presentment. Third, if he is presenting
for another you have the right to see his delegated authority to make the
presentment. Fourth, you have the right to have all payments shown on the face
of the instrument along with the balance to be paid. And last, you have the right to have this
done at a reasonable time and place. You
have these rights even if the claimant is the
In the 341 meeting in
bankruptcy you will have to be very adamant in your demands for this with the
trustee. Especially with the IRS claim
or claims for "property or income taxes". Neither of them ever shows a liability,
merely a demand for payment, not money, because only the insane still believe
there is money. Governments use several
different types of claim forms to make demands upon the citizenry. The most common is the traffic ticket. Most everyone has received one at some time
or other. The ticket is a commercial
claim upon your ability to pay or perform.
(More on that latter) The other forms of making claims are very
similar. The cop stops you and says that
you were violating some statute and that the bail will be so much for that
offense. He will even sign the ticket
under the penalty of perjury that he saw you commit the stated violation. This happened to Berl Brown of
A correlative liability
does arise with the traffic stop as well as the federal agency claim. When an officer makes a traffic stop of
someone not engaged in commerce [carrying passengers or freight for hire, or
profit and gain.] he has committed three
felonies, to wit, armed assault, extortion and identity theft. These are injuries to the one being stopped
and so create a liability of the State or County to compensate you for your
injuries."
All that government does
and provides legitimately is in pursuit of its duty to provide protection for
private rights (Wynhammer v. People, 13 NY 378), which duty is a debt owed to
its creator, WE THE PEOPLE and the private unenfranchised individual; which
debt and duty is never extinguished nor discharged, and is perpetual. No matter what the de facto government/state
provides for us in manner of convenience and safety, the unenfranchised
individual owes nothing to the government." Hale v. Henkel, 201
"We the people have
discharged any debt which may be said to exist or owed to the
state/government. The governments are, presumably,
indebted continually to the people, because the people (the sovereigns)
presumably assented to the 1878 creation of the government corporation and
because we suffer its continued existence.
The continued debt owed to the people is discharged only as it continues
not to violate our private rights, and when government fails in its duty to
provide protection-discharge its debt to the people, it is an abandonment
[delictual fault] of any and all power, authority or vestige of sovereignty
which it may have otherwise possessed, and the laws remain the same, the
sovereignty reverting to the people whence it came." Downes
v. Bidwell, 182
When a government agent
trespasses on our private rights, it is a tort and this creates a liability for
the government to compensate us for that injury. This comes about because the citation shows
no liability of the defendant to the statute they claim you violated. They failed to state a claim because without
a swearing to liability there is no claim.
I use a traffic citation here as an example because all of the other
entanglements with government are handled the same way. IRS, BATF and all the rest of the alphabet
soup use the same procedure. On the
A claim is really the
affidavit swearing to the liability of the defendant. A "warrant"
issued without an affidavit of liability is not a warrant at all. The best that can be said of it is that it is
an order to kidnap. To be a real warrant
it must be issued upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation
(affidavit of liability sworn to by a competent witness). This is what gives the court subject matter
and personal jurisdiction. Without
the swearing to liability by a competent witness, no court or tribunal can have
jurisdiction. It is only the swearing to the liability,
whether it is contractual, statutory or anything else that can support a charge
of a violation of any kind. If you have
no contractual liability, then you cannot violate or breach any contract. If you are not engaged in an activity that
renders you liable and therefore subject to a statute, then you have no
liability to that statute and therefore lack the requisite intent [mens rea is
not longer required, i.e., did you or did you not do the act?] or capacity to
violate it. Liability is the only thing
that can form a basis for, or give rise to, any charge. The liability of the defendant must be
discovered by him and presented, for him to be correctly informed of the nature
and cause of any charges or accusations he must face. The failure and refusal to present this
liability is a severe tort that must be redressed. Without the swearing to liability an
"arrest" is actually a kidnapping.
[Kidnap, v. 1 to carry away for the purpose of denying a right. Bouviers law dictionary.] Without the swearing to the liability any
"trial" in any court or tribunal is a mockery. Justice is disregarded, perverted and
parodied. The refusal(s) to verify the
liability and resulting kidnap prevents any lawful process. The court or tribunal is characterized by
unauthorized or irregular procedures, so as to render a fair or impartial
[meaningful] proceeding impossible.
Before we leave the topic
of liability let's look at the least understood use of a tool to discover
liability. Bankruptcy is the best tool there is to discover
liability. The whole operation of
Bankruptcy is set up to discover liability.
It is seldom operated that way, but it is extremely useful tool. The petitioner is really in charge if he
hasn't been saddled with an attorney. In
bankruptcy the "debtor", or the one filing the voluntary petition,
simply places all of his assets in the hands of a trustee to protect while he
discovers all of his liability. If the
trustee does not properly protect your assets, he is subject to the tort claim
act and also he has a bond that can be claimed.
The petitioner lists all of the debts that he owes. If there is a question about some claims that
have been clogging your mailbox, simply do not list them. If you list someone as a creditor then you
have the burden of proof that you do not owe them. It is you that decides who is and who is not
a creditor. You send out the proof of
claim forms (form 10's) to everyone that might actually have a claim so they
may present any evidence of debt they have.
Any form 10 returned to the court must be accompanied by evidence of debt
or it is a fraud. The meeting of the
secured creditors provided for under section 341 of the Bankruptcy code
(usually referred to as the 341 meeting) is the time and place for presentment
of any liability held and for the petitioner to examine the evidence of debt
presented for payment. This is the place
where the petitioner gets a chance to look beyond the document presented and
either reconfirm or repudiate any liability.
This is true even if there is a judgment presented. Judgments
must be supported by an affidavit swearing to your liability, or based upon
facts presented to the court, in order for the judge to have authority to sign
them. Otherwise they are a fraud. The 341 meeting is also the place where you
can examine any contract to see if it is a conscionable or legal contract. If it is an unconscionable or an illegal
contract it can be repudiated and if monies have been collected, then an action
for fraud can be initiated in the article 3 courts that the bankruptcy court is
appended to. This is true even of the
IRS. The only thing that can create a
debt with the IRS is the assessment. 26
USC section 6203 says that if a taxpayer requests a copy of the assessment one
will be furnished to him showing the date of the assessment, the amount of the
assessment, the character of the liability (the activity that rendered you
liable) and the tax period if applicable.
If the IRS files a proof of claim without the evidence of debt then it
is a fraud and if the trustee and judge try to impress you with the legality of
the "debt" with the IRS then they have trespassed/joined the
fraud. So the repayment plan for
bankruptcy is a simple one. Just state
that you plan: (1). To pay 100% of all assessed
taxes. (2). To
pay all proven liability. (3). To bring an action for fraud, in the article 3 courts,
against anyone filing a proof of claim (form 10) unaccompanied by evidence of
debt, obligation or liability. Also one
other thing, never go into bankruptcy without tort claims in hand, you can fill
them out as you go. Of course none of
this is possible if you are saddled with a lawyer; because having a lawyer
means that you waive all defects in the process of the case. Bankruptcy is the place where you take your
remedy as a sovereign against nuisance claims or that are likely to he
supported by kangaroo courts and presented as judgments. It is not a judicial court - it is merely
appended to one. It is a commercial
court set up for the processing of commercial claims designated as either civil
or criminal; an Edomite/Talmudic custom, carried on today in full regalia under
the tutelage of the House of David and Vicarious Filii Dei. In the unadulterated and pure English common
law, emanating from the Ten Commandment Law, an absconding debtor, if overtaken
and abducted, could be put to death on account of the amount of the creditor’s
claim against him, for loss and damages, verified under oath. Likewise, if the alleged creditor falsified
his claim, then he would have to give full account of his assets to satisfy the
alleged debtor’s damages for unlawful arrest and imprisonment, etc., and if
they were not enough, would fall to the creditor’s heirs as a personal
liability, and in the event the heirs had not to satisfy the account, the
creditor could be put to death after forfeiting his estate. Has it ever dawned on you, the reader, what
happened at
This word "DEFALCATION" is
found under CCRA in the Privacy Act, Access to Information Book, vol # 1. Means, the act or an
instance of embezzling. Failure to meet a Promise or expectation. Cdn Dictionary of Law = does not necessarily
entail a dishonest or wrongful act. It
is sufficient if there is a failure to meet an obligation by a fiduciary. A breach of trust arises whenever a trustee
fails to carry out his obligations under the terms of the trust. [they are all trustees in bankruptcy, because that’s all
there is, same as the Edomites were] Includes any fraudulent act or omission of a public officer that
occasions loss in money or property to (a) Her Majesty, or (b) Persons other
than Her Majesty, when such money or property was in the Custody of the public
officer in the course of his public duties. Given the entire Canadian economy is based on
a Bankruptcy which Means anything and everything created by or with Government
paper is also Bankrupt, which would include every single, non living breathing,
Piece of paper vessel/corporation existing in name only, means all Accounts are
held in trust, as Bankrupts cannot hold asset accounts, claiming same to be its
property. Any act other than the act as
prescribed a fiduciary under Bankruptcy conditions would be embezzlement,
fraud, breach of trust, criminal breach of trust [s.336 C.C.C.], and if any one
of those paper entities claims you owe money to it. The expressed intent would be clear, that
that party is attempting to use the value of your property against you, when
that party should be acting only as guided by you, the true owner.
If you prove there is no
money [how can one prove a negative?], you know why a tax exemption is
applicable for the benefit of the seller only, after a sale and purchase by a
buyer. This word "REMISSION is
found in the same book. Means, remittance. Re
= to do again. What is it that is being
[re] mitted? Slang for"MITT" =
hand. re handed, renegotiated, negotiated. Commercial Paper. Now when you are reading and thinking about
all this material, do not let your mind read it from one angle. As you get to see more truth and light, and
learn more of the rules as they apply to commerce, you will know that you are
not the criminal here, if anyone is.
Same as if you read the Bankruptcy Act.
You are not the debtor or Bankrupt, even though you can put your ALL CAP
into Bankruptcy, if you had to prove that all corporations or entities that
exist in name only, are in fact Bankrupt. They can’t have any assets, contrary to the
year-end Statements they put out. The
value(s) in those accounts does not belong to the entrusted trustee holder
operating as a bankrupt in a Bankruptcy, whose Accounts should never move from
a zero balance. You may have to dig to
find out why this is so. I think we can
use the word Defalcation as part of our Acceptances. Conditional upon proof of claim that the
fiduciary holder of My Account did not commit a defalcation by dishonoring the
bill, attached hereto, negotiated back to the DRAWER/OFFEROR for the adjustment
and set-off, or settlement of the Account.
In Regards To the Subpoena Duces Tecum, before we begin let’s define
our terms.
subpoena
(se-pee-ne), n. (Latin “under penalty”) A writ commanding a person to appear
before a court or other tribunal, subject to a penalty for failing to comply,
-- also spelled subpoena. Plural. subpoenas.
subpoena duces tecum (se-pee-ne d(y)oo-seez tee-kem
also doo-sez tay-kem), (Law Latin) A subpoena ordering the witness to appear
and to bring specified documents or records. Blacks Law
Dictionary 7th ed. Pg. 1440. The
subpoena duces tecum is the primary tool for discovery. I know of no other use for it. If you need to compel a witness to testify at
a trial or hearing, you would use just the subpoena. If you want them to produce documents in
addition to testimony or if you want them to only produce documents, you use
the subpoena duces tecum. The documents
then become their testimony. discovery, n. 1. The act or process of finding or learning
something that was previously unknown <after making the discovery, the
inventor immediately applied for a patent>.2. Compulsory
disclosure, at a party’s request, of information that relates to the litigation
< the plaintiff files a motion to compel discovery>. The primary discovery devices are
interrogatories, depositions, request for admissions and request for production. Although discovery typically comes from
parties, courts also allow limited discovery from non-parties. 3. The facts or documents disclosed <the
new associate spent all her time reviewing discovery>. -discover,
vb. - discoverable, adj. “Discovery has
broad scope. According to Federal Rule
26, which is the model in modern procedural codes, inquiry may be made into any
matter of the action. Thus, discovery
may be had of facts incidentally relevant to the issue in the pleadings even if
the facts do not directly prove or disprove the facts in question.” Geoffery C.
Hazard, Jr. & Michele Taruffo, American Civil Procedure: An introduction 115 (1993).post judgment
discovery. Discovery conducted after
judgment has been rendered usu. To
determine the nature of the judgment debtor’s assets or to obtain testimony for
use in future proceedings. - also termed post-trial
discovery; pre-trial discovery.
Discovery conducted before trial to reveal facts and develop evidence.
Modern procedural rules have broadened the scope of pretrial discovery to
prevent the parties from surprising each other with evidence at trial. discovery abuse,
1. The misuse of the
discovery process, esp. by making over broad requests for information that is
unnecessary or beyond the scope of permissible disclosure. 2. The failure to respond adequately to
proper discovery requests. ~ Also termed abuse of discovery. “The term ‘discovery abuse’ has been used as
if it was a single concept, but it includes several different things. Thus, it is useful to subdivide ‘abuse’ into
‘misuse’ and ‘’overuse’. What is
referred to as ‘misuse’ would include not only direct violations of the rules,
as by failing to respond to discovery requests within the stated time limit,
but also more subtle attempts to harass or obstruct an opponent, as by giving
obviously inadequate answers or by requesting information that is clearly
outside the scope of discovery. By
‘overuse’ is meant asking for more discovery than is necessary or appropriate
to the particular case. ‘Overuse’ in turn, can be subdivided into problems of
‘depth’ and ‘breadth’ with ‘depth’ referring to discovery that may be relevant
but is simply excessive and ‘breadth’ referring to discovery requests that go
into matters that are too far removed from the case.” Charles Alan Wright, the
law of Federal Courts Section 81, at 580 (5th ed. 1994). discovery rule. ‘Civil procedure’. The rule that limitation period does not
begin to run until the plaintiff discovers (or reasonably should have discovered)
the injury giving rise to the claim. The
discovery rule usu. applies to injuries that are inherently difficult to
detect, such as those resulting from medical malpractice. See STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS, or OCCURRENCE RULE. Blacks Law Dictionary 7th ed. Pg 478. When set upon by an agent, employee or
servant of the government with unsupported accusations, if you are like most
people, you will start to argue and deny.
To your adversaries, this indicates an acceptance of the accusations and
the start of the rape of justice. To
give any court or tribunal jurisdiction the accusations must be supported by
material facts, sworn to by a competent witness. No affidavit or deposition, no
jurisdiction. Without them the pleadings
are not sufficient to give the court or tribunal jurisdictions and any judgment
or order issuing from such court or tribunal is null and void and without force
and effect. If they are accusations of
the common law variety then you are entitled to know the nature and cause of
the accusations. If they aren’t
forthcoming then you must move for compulsory discovery. This can be at the preliminary hearing or
later if you are not so informed at the preliminary. Normally, the subpoena is used to compel
testimony under oath. If the testimony
indicates documents exist that can be used, then the subpoena duces tecum is
used to compel the production of that document.
If the accusations state that you violated some statute, code or
ordinance, then they must be supported by the affidavit of the accusing
officer, agent or employee of the government swearing that you are subject to
the statute, code, or ordinance and therefore have a liability to that
particular code or ordinance. This
swearing must be of his own personal knowledge. It cannot be related by someone else. If
there is a liability to the statute, code or ordinance and it is not stated on
the charging instrument, then it is discovery by subpoena or subpoena duces
tecum. If the charging instrument is an
indictment, then the transcript of the grand jury must be subpoenaed up with a
subpoena duces tecum. The witness that
testified in front of them, under oath, must be subpoenaed so his testimony in
front of the grand jury can be crossed examined at the trial. All of this is pointed to one thing and one
thing only, that is DISCOVERY; discovery of the nature and cause of the
accusations you face or of your liability under the statute. Without discovery of the nature and cause or
your liability under the statute, you have no way of knowing how to defend or
just what you are defending against.
Also it renders void any judgment or order from the court or
tribunal. The denial of discovery denies
the court or tribunal jurisdiction and makes any “trial” or hearing they may
hold a fraud. Not an OOPS, not a faux
pas, but an intentional and malicious fraud, designed and activated, under
color of any law, for the purpose of extracting money or labor from their
targeted victim. It renders the court, a
Kangaroo Court. kangaroo court. 1. A self appointed tribunal or mock court in which the
principles of law and justice are disregarded,
perverted or parodied. *Kangaroo courts
may be assembled by various groups, such as prisoners in a jail (to settle
disputes between inmates) and players on a baseball team (to punish team mates
who commit fielding errors). 2. A court
or tribunal characterized by “authorized” or irregular procedures, esp. so as
to render a fair proceeding impossible.
3. A sham legal proceeding.
Black’s 7th page 359. One of the
purposes of the legal “profession” is to prevent you from getting
discovery. If you hire (?) an attorney
he/she will accept discovery for you and tell you that he/she have all he/she
needs to put on your defense. The
discovery you get will not have an affidavit of the accusing officer as to your
liability. If you push the issue they
will tell you to get another attorney.
If you have a public defender they will tell you something very similar
and tell the court to put you in jail to await trial; anything to distract your
attention from discovery. If you insist
that they respond to your filed and issued subpoena duces tecum, they will run
like rats. They have to run. They are
only equipped to argue. They are not
equipped to win and they refuse to get so equipped. Discovery could eliminate their excuse for
losing, so it must be avoided. So,
discovery is something you must do in spite of your attorney, not because of
him. If you are not handicapped with an
attorney then you have a fighting chance to get smart enough to win. If you accept the services of an attorney, in
any capacity, it is a declaration of your incompetence to handle your own
affairs and you will be committed to prison for that incompetence. If you pay for their services, you loose
twice because you are still going to prison.
However, once you are free from the handicap of the attorney you can
move for post judgment discovery, or post trial discovery. All of this is done with the subpoena duces
tecum and all of it is for the purpose of discovery. The subpoena duces tecum, as stated above, is
for specific documents. None of this “any and all documents showing “.
That would be discovery abuse and the opposition would move for a
protective order. Be specific. You don’t have to know the actual title of
the document needed. You can subpoena
documents by content, such as “produce a true copy of the contract between the
judge and the State of . . . . . . “ or “the affidavit
of the accusing officer swearing to my liability to code section . . . .” These are specific enough to be pulled from
any record that they may exist within.
Another little touch is to add the statement, “If no such document
exists, please so declare for the record in this action.” And always state the document is needed for
discovery. More than one document can be
called out on one subpoena, if they are in the care, control and custody of the
same person. Just as the subpoena duces
tecum is for specific documents, they are also served on specified, designated
individuals. Those individuals can be designated either by name or position,
such as “John Mays Smith” or “Director of . . .” or “officer holding report
numbers . . .” Be as specific as you can.
If you have no idea, then ask the department, agent or agency that has
the document. Also bear in mind that the
subpoena duces tecum is court specific and requires a case number so the needed
documents are returned to the proper file.
That is to say, that all courts have their own forms. They vary from court to court and usually in
more ways than just the court caption.
Some courts will give or sell you a subpoena duces tecum with the court
seal and the signature of the court clerk already affixed. If they charge for them, it will be a normal
fee, $1.00 or so. Some courts will give
you the subpoenas but will not sign and seal them until you bring them back
completely filed out. Some courts
combine the subpoena and the subpoena duces tecum and you have to write in the
words “duces tecum.” In a few rare
instances the court will tell you to make up your own using the model in the
law library’s form book and use the court caption. Regardless of the form or method, the
subpoena duces tecum should have certain information on it to be
effective. 1. It should be addressed to
the designated individual that probably has possession of the needed
documents. 2. It should list the
documents you need for discovery. 3. It
should state the purpose for the production of the documents, which must always
include discovery even if there are other reasons. The subpoena duces tecum should be contained within a motion titled
“motion for discovery and compulsory production of the documents by subpoena
duces tecum.” Once served with
the motion for compulsory production of documents, the originals are returned
to the court and made part of the record, along with a certificate of
service. Since the subpoena duces tecum,
a common law writ, issues out, under the seal of the court and the signature of
the clerk, at your behest, this effectively opens your court. This always triggers a flurry of activity,
usually in the form of a motion to quash the subpoenas. If you are the defendant, which
you probably are, you must oppose the motion to quash on the grounds that it is
your discovery. The tribunals (courts
are judicial, tribunals are administrative) really don’t have the authority to
quash your subpoenas because they are your common law writ,
however, they usually issue an order granting the motion to quash. Everyone connected with the police courts
considers this as a quash and they tell each other
that the subpoenas are quashed. It makes
them feel good, but you don’t have to worry about it. If the issue goes to trial and you are
permitted to subpoena witnesses and present evidence in your behalf, you trot
them out again and demand the evidence be brought forward. All of the above tells you how things are
supposed to happen. Anyone that has
fought the good fight for their liberty knows that things get fouled up as only
lawyers can foul them up. So keep in
mind that the subpoena duces tecum is only a tool to use against an attack by
the domestic terrorists. It is not an
end-all and be-all. It is a simple tool
and you can use it in different places and at different times. It is your tool so use it to your benefit.
_______________________________________
fn/1 FACTOIDS
1. The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. (Diversified
Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law
94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law
102-391.). See also: Bretton Woods
Agreement, as amended.
2. The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg.
816).
3. The
4. The
5. The
6. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never
part of the
7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF. The Application for a Social Security Number
is the SS5 form. The Department of the
Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who or what
publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that they are Department of the
Treasury forms. You can get a copy of
the SS5 you filled out by sending form SSA-L996 to the SS Administration. (20
CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2)(2).
8. There are no Judicial courts in
9. There have not been any Judges in
10. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. House
Report (103-826)
11. We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary
System.
12. The UN is a One World Super Government.
13. No one on this planet has ever been free. This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been a One World
Government. It is just that now it is
much better organized and has changed its name from the
14.
15. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust
Fund. (Helvering v.
16. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an
Agency of the UN. (Look at it if you receive one. It should have written on the
top left United States Treasury.)
17. You own no property, slaves can't own property. Read the Deed to the
property that you think is yours. You are listed as a Tenant. (Senate Document
43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)
18. The most powerful court in
19. The Revolutionary War was a fraud.
20. The King of
21. You can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are
not a party to it. Padelford
Fay & Co. v. The Mayor
and Alderman of The City of
22.
23.
24. The Pope can abolish any law in the
26. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest
and discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493).
27. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of
people. (Papal Bulls
of 1455 and 1493).
28. The Pope’s
laws are obligatory on everyone.(Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44).
29. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing not even what we think are
our children.(Tillman v. Roberts108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten, 154 N.E. 146,
Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481).
30. Military Dictator George Washington divided the States (Estates) into
Districts. (Messages and papers of the Presidents Vol 1, pg
99.Websters 1828 dictionary for definition of Estate.).
31. "We The People" does not include you and me. (Barron v. Mayor &
City Council of Baltimore. 32
32. The
33. It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and
arrest code breakers. Sapp v.
34. Everything in the "
35. We are Human capital. (Executive Order 13037).
36. The UN has
financed the operations of the
37. The good news is we don't have to fulfill "our" fictitious
obligations. You can discharge a fictitious obligation with another's
fictitious obligation.
38. The depression and World War